“I Do Not Read Recreationally,” A Reflection

To be clear, these are not my words. Read on for the source.

For those of you unfamiliar with my professional path outside of the words on this blog, I have prioritized educating, training, and inspiring future leaders of America over Bourbon & Battles for the last year. I break that silence today for some reflection inspired by a single written comment from a student.

To get to know my newest group of students last week, I asked each of them to fill out a bio card. One of the pieces of information I asked for: favorite book. I mostly wanted to see what authors and titles inspired this cohort—military history and more military history abound, as did some classics, and more than one mention of 1984. Shamelessly, I also wanted to see if I could use their recommendations to add some more tomes to my “to-read” list. Turns out, I did.

But to my instant consternation, I received this answer on one bio card: “I do not read recreationally.”

giphy1giphy2giphy3

Immediately, I felt like this young person needed some serious redirecting and counseling. President Harry S Truman is famously quoted as saying “Not all readers are leaders, but all leaders are readers.” Add that to the seemingly bottomless availability of “reading lists” and “book lists” from the top of the military all the way down to lowly blog outlets (mine included). To read such a comment from an individual selected to attend the world’s premier leadership institute took me aback.

Certainly an undergraduate education will force reading down cadets’ throats, whether they like it or not, but under what conditions does one simply not enjoy reading?

reading-sucks_o_2290533
Some folks feel this way, I’m sure, but I just can’t understand it.

While not my first reaction, it was brought to my attention that perhaps this student read for personal or professional development, but did not consider reading as “recreational.” I would like to believe that, but the question was “favorite book,” which precluded any delineation between “types” of reading. Perhaps this young person simply didn’t have a “favorite” book. I would like to believe that also, but the cadet voluntarily wrote “I do not read recreationally” unprompted.

Okay, but perhaps young leaders can develop without books. What about podcasts, blogs, newspapers, and other forms of non-book media? While I am uncertain if this particular person consumes any of these media instead of books (something I will be sure to follow up on), are these forms adequate substitutes for the long-form, often in-depth writing found in books? Are books superior? My gut reaction to the latter question is yes! However, is that just a bias I’ve developed from decades of book reading, or is it perhaps a greater cultural bias found in the military officer corps?

The Rise of the Non-Reader

According to a Pew Research Center Survey in 2016, about a quarter of the entire American adult population had not read a book (to include audio or electronic) in the preceding 12 months. That same survey showed a disaggregation by socioeconomic variables, and those resulted as you might expect (more money, more reading; more education, more reading). But even the age group variable indicated that college-age Americans tend to read “for pleasure” more than other cohorts.

pi_2016-09-01_book-reading_0-07

Perhaps more disturbing than the 26% of non-readers is the overall downward trend of reading in America. In a 2015 survey conducted by the National Endowment for the Arts literary reading is on the decline (as reported by The Washington Post):

WaPo Reading

Beyond this one case, given the increasingly challenging recruiting environment, can we expect more future military leaders to be non-readers? Do we have a professional mandate to correct those who identify as non-readers—those who “do not read recreationally” outside of a class assignment?


I chose not turn this blog post into an argument for the merits of reading books, because that argument has been made elsewhere. (I’ve even made the argument for more fiction in military professional reading right here on B&B.) But I do feel like it is important to contemplate the reasons why we encourage reading as military leaders. How would you convince a young leader that they should read for recreation?


If you like this post, please share it using the buttons below. Follow Bourbon & Battles on Twitter |@BourbonBattles and on Facebook |https://www.facebook.com/BourbonandBattles. Add to this conversation by leaving a reply below.

Advertisements

One thought on ““I Do Not Read Recreationally,” A Reflection”

  1. Does he not read at all, recreationally, or does he not read traditionally-bound books? While the internet has proven false the concept that “a million monkeys on a million typewriters would recreate the works of Shakespeare,” printing out Wikipedia would take up volumes. There is a certain idolatry that we readers give to books, to the point where I could see viewing a hardbound translation of “The Art of War” as more significantly scholarly than the version found on zhongwen.com, but the online version (if I take the time to dissect it) probably offers greater insight into Sun Tzu’s intent than Samuel B. Griffiths does (nothing against Mr. Griffiths; I’m a caveman howling about fire, next to him). Still, I don’t consider it a book.

    Liked by 1 person

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s